Saturday, December 10, 2011

"Mickey Mouse" and D-Day

"Mickey Mouse" and D-Day


Clarification of the usual "Mickey Mouse" and D-Day story:


... a very brief United Press item, datelined London, on June 8, 1944. The exact wording in the three papers differs, thanks presumably to editing, but the substance in each is the same. Here's the UP item as it appeared in the Charleston (West Virginia) Daily Mail:

Mickey Mouse played a part in the invasion of northern France, it was revealed today.
Naval officers gathering for invasion briefing at a southern port approached the sentry at the door and furtively whispered into his ear the password of admission: "Mickey Mouse."

MichaelBarrier.com -- "What's New" "Mickey Mouse" and D-Day

Thursday, December 08, 2011

Driving in a barrel

Driving in a barrel


A traveling carnival in India builds this barrel and puts on this show. I am amazed no one flies over the edge.

Turn the sound off



Well of Death (AKA Maut ka Kuaa) - YouTube

Wednesday, December 07, 2011

Fun with a 15 Ton Loader

Fun with a 15 Ton Loader



Skills with a 15 Ton Loader - YouTube

BBC News - Contaminated water leaks from Fukushima nuclear plant



Contaminated water leaks from Fukushima nuclear plant

Tepco said the water leak at the treatment system was found on Sunday morning

Contaminated water has leaked from a treatment system at Japan's crippled Fukushima nuclear plant, with some potentially entering the sea, the plant's operator says.

Workers found the leak - caused by a crack in a concrete foundation - on Sunday morning.

Tepco said some 45 cubic metres (1,590 cubic feet) of water had escaped before sandbags blocked the leak.


....BBC News - Contaminated water leaks from Fukushima nuclear plant

Tuesday, December 06, 2011

Google: An explanation of our search results

Google: An explanation of our search results

If you recently used Google to search for the word “Jew,” you may have seen results that were very disturbing. We assure you that the views expressed by the sites in your results are not in any way endorsed by Google. We’d like to explain why you’re seeing these results when you conduct this search.

A site’s ranking in Google’s search results relies heavily on computer algorithms using thousands of factors to calculate a page’s relevance to a given query. Sometimes subtleties of language cause anomalies to appear that cannot be predicted. A search for “Jew” brings up one such unexpected result.

If you use Google to search for “Judaism,” “Jewish” or “Jewish people,” the results are informative and relevant. So why is a search for “Jew” different? One reason is that the word “Jew” is often used in an anti-Semitic context. Jewish organizations are more likely to use the word “Jewish” when talking about members of their faith. The word has become somewhat charged linguistically, as noted on websites devoted to Jewish topics such as these:

Someone searching for information on Jewish people would be more likely to enter terms like “Judaism,” “Jewish people,” or “Jews” than the single word “Jew” In fact, prior to this incident, the word “Jew” only appeared about once in every 10 million search queries. Now it’s likely that the great majority of searches on Google for “Jew” are by people who have heard about this issue and want to see the results for themselves.

The beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google, as well as the opinions of the general public, do not determine or impact our search results. Individual citizens and public interest groups do periodically urge us to remove particular links or otherwise adjust search results. Although Google reserves the right to address such requests individually, Google views the comprehensiveness of our search results as an extremely important priority. Accordingly, we do not remove a page from our search results simply because its content is unpopular or because we receive complaints concerning it. We will, however, remove pages from our results if we believe the page (or its site) violates our Webmaster Guidelines, if we believe we are required to do so by law, or at the request of the webmaster who is responsible for the page.

We apologize for the upsetting nature of the experience you had using Google and appreciate your taking the time to inform us about it.

Sincerely,
The Google Team

P.S. You may be interested in some additional information the Anti-Defamation League has posted about this issue at http://www.adl.org/rumors/google_search_rumors.asp. In addition, we call your attention to Google’s search results on this topic.

©2011 Google


Google: An explanation of our search results