Friday, June 04, 2010

Law.com - At Congressional Hearing, BP Official Resists Defining 'Legitimate' Claims

At Congressional Hearing, BP Official Resists Defining 'Legitimate' Claims

The National Law Journal
May 28, 2010


A top BP PLC executive declined to be specific Thursday when pressed at a congressional hearing to say what kind of claims the company will pay from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

The House Judiciary Committee is holding a hearing on the liability questions surrounding the Gulf of Mexico spill, including the response of the companies involved and the damage limits written into federal law. Darryl Willis, BP's vice president for resources, is representing the company at the hearing.

"We are going to pay all legitimate claims," Willis said, repeating a company refrain that has drawn skepticism from lawmakers and from plaintiffs' advocates, who have brought scores of class actions and other lawsuits against BP and other companies.

Law.com - At Congressional Hearing, BP Official Resists Defining 'Legitimate' Claims

Thursday, June 03, 2010

Rabbi Steve Gutow: Why is this Rabbi in Viet Nam?

Rabbi Steve Gutow

Posted: May 25, 2010 05:29 PM 
 
It is my first visit to Vietnam, and I want to let you know why I am here and what I am learning.
It is Sunday evening in Ho Chi Minh City, formerly Saigon. Why is this rabbi in Vietnam? The question has been asked of me over and over during the last couple of months since I decided to come on this interfaith mission. I jokingly told some people that there was evidence that the lost tribe of Dan had been brought here 2800 years ago by the Assyrians and I was going to witness the archaeological evidence. Of course, that is a bad joke, or weak humor.
I am here on a week-long, Ford-Foundation-sponsored trip to look at the residual impact of our country's use of Agent Orange on the people and the land here. Judaism teaches me to bear witness to the pains of this world and to see what can be done to remedy that pain. In the days ahead I am going to see some real agony, and my hope is that our community will find ways to respond to what has occurred here. Also, I feel that it is important that a delegation like this one (see its makeup below) have a representative of the Jewish people within it. These are the reasons, and this is my first blog entry after a very challenging, more-than-24-hour travel experience.
The situation is this. In the sixties and early seventies, during the Vietnam War, we used several dangerous chemical agents to devastate the Vietnamese countryside. One of those chemicals was Agent Orange, a compound that contains dioxin, a dangerous poison that contributes to a host of deadly and/or debilitating diseases, the effects of which can have a very, very long duration. The impact has been considerable on both the Vietnamese and on American veterans and their families. The science of causality is imprecise, and our nation is not thrilled about claiming responsibility, but we have given a considerable -- if still wanting -- sum to our veterans and their families. However, we have given only about $9 million to Vietnam, yet the Ford Foundation itself has given close to $12 million. In Vietnam the injuries are not only to people (as if "only to people" is a limiting phrase) but also to the environment. The environmental damage is to the long-term sustainability of the countryside, and it is clearly the cause of several "hotspots" (one of which we will visit tomorrow) where the dioxin levels are overwhelming.
We will talk with government officials, medical personnel, and victims. We will view the countryside and, as I said above, visit the Da Nang "hot spot" left behind when the United States military pulled out in the Spring of 1975. (More about this in a later blog entry.)
The people on this trip from the United States are a quite impressive group. A list of the members of the delegation follows:
  • Delegation leader Bob Edgar, a former congressman and present CEO of Common Cause, as well as a host of other engagements that permit him to be a strong and caring leader of our small band.
  • Sister Maureen Fiedler, Sister of Loretto, Ph.D., host of the public radio talk show Interfaith Voices. We studied the Torah portion Naso together.
  • The Rev. Richard Cizik, President of the New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good and a Fellow at the Open Society Institute and UN Foundation.
  • James Winkler, General Secretary of the United Methodist General Board of Church and Society.
  • Dr. Carroll A. Baltimore, Sr., First Vice President of the Progressive National Baptist Convention.
  • Paulette Peterson, a clinical psychologist in the U.S. Veterans Administration.
  • Shariq A. Siddigui, the Executive Director of the Muslim Alliance of Indiana and Director of Legal Services at the Julian Center.
  • The Rev. Michael Livingston, Executive Director of the International Council of Community Churches and former President of the National Council of the Churches of Christ USA.
  • The Rev. Victor Hsu, former staffer for Asian Affairs at both World Vision and Church World Service.
  • Susan V. Berresford, convener of the U.S.-Vietnam Dialogue Group on Agent Orange/Dioxin, and former President of the Ford Foundation.
  • Charles Bailey, Vietnam Program Director for the Ford Foundation.

The heat here is oppressive. Sweat forms almost immediately all over the body in the sun of the day, and the nights are not so cool either. It is fitting that we should suffer in this way as we try and empathize with what has happened here and as we grapple with our nation's hoped-for efforts in trying to resolve the situation.
There is a Chabad rabbi from Israel here in Saigon. Although I spoke with him yesterday, I sadly do not think I will have time to visit him. Starting tomorrow we will travel to both Da Nang and Hanoi. I suspect we will encounter utter pain as we connect with the residual effects of war. We will learn in a deep way that wars do not end simply because peace treaties are signed. Judaism teaches us that knowledge must precede remedy, and we have embarked on what should be a journey for the acquisition of significant knowledge. Many of us lived through this war. Some like myself opposed our nation's involvement and found legal ways not to serve. I managed to attend many marches in Washington and Austin in opposition to American engagement. I fought for Presidential leadership that would have ended this war, particularly in 1968, spending days in Chicago at the Democratic Party convention there. My principles led me not to fight, but I must admit that the years have taught me that not serving leaves a residue of guilt -- why did so many of my fellow citizens die, particular those who were poor, while I used the privileges afforded me to live? I will try to deal some with these personal questions while I am here.
We are embarking on the thirty-fifth anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War and the fifteenth anniversary of the reestablishment of American diplomatic relations with Vietnam. It is a good time to see what we can and should do to ameliorate some of the agony, some of the pain.

Why Is This Rabbi in Vietnam?

Tuesday, June 01, 2010

What If Chicago Loses Its Gun Case?

Absolutely. If you make something dangerous, you are responsible for its social cost. If you sell cars, you should sell to responsible people, and make sure they all know how to drive and have insurance.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Internet addicts guilty of starving baby to death - Yahoo! News


SEOUL, South Korea – A South Korean couple were convicted Friday of abandoning their newborn daughter, who starved to death while they addictively played an online game raising a virtual child.

The husband, a 41-year-old taxi driver, and his 25-year-old wife were sentenced to two years in prison, but the woman's term was suspended because she is pregnant.

The couple played at Internet cafes on average 10 hours every day and bottle-fed their baby only once a day, prosecutors said in an affidavit.

Internet addicts guilty of starving baby to death - Yahoo! News

No Fair! Kids and Adults View Fairness Differently | LiveScience

Culture

No Fair! Kids and Adults View Fairness Differently

By Rachael Rettner, LiveScience Staff Writer
posted: 27 May 2010 02:05 pm ET


What we consider "fair" changes as we age, a new study finds. Young children like all things to be equal, but older adolescents are more likely to consider merit when it comes to dividing up wealth, the researchers say. 

The shift from the "egalitarian" view of fairness to the more merit-based "meritocratic" view occurred largely between fifth and seventh grade, although it continued to change through high school, with seniors placing the most importance on achievement. 

This transition likely results both from changes in the brain as it develops, and from exposure to new social experiences as we age, the researchers say. For instance, children might participate in more and more activities in which a greater emphasis is placed on individual achievement as they grow up.


No Fair! Kids and Adults View Fairness Differently | LiveScience

Zoologger: Flashmobbing locusts have redesigned brains - life - 26 May 2010 - New Scientist

NEW SCIENTIST.COM

Zoologger: Flashmobbing locusts have redesigned brains

Habitat: throughout north Africa, the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent – and in biblical scenes of woe

In one of history's earliest recorded bioterrorist threats, Moses warned a recalcitrant pharoah: "I will bring locusts into your country… They will cover the face of the ground so that it cannot be seen. They will devour what little you have left…"

Moses might have added, "and their brains will be freakishly enlarged". It turns out that swarming locusts have brains almost a third larger than their solitary cousins – brains that have also been radically redesigned.


Zoologger: Flashmobbing locusts have redesigned brains - life - 26 May 2010 - New Scientist

Thursday, May 27, 2010

NYT Editorial - Throwing the Rule Book at the N.F.L. - NYTimes.com

NYTimes Editorial

Throwing the Rule Book at the N.F.L.

The National Football League does not condone gambling, but it lost a giant bet this week when the Supreme Court firmly rejected its contention that it is not subject to the nation’s antitrust laws. The court’s unanimous decision sends a conspicuous message to other sports leagues — except Major League Baseball — that when it comes to selling merchandise, charging for parking and paying players, they have to play by the rules.



Editorial - Throwing the Rule Book at the N.F.L. - NYTimes.com

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Picture from the Boosted Output Zone Optimization test

http://wheelhouseadvisors.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/mushroom-cloud.jpg

Friday, May 14, 2010

'Impossible motion' trick wins Illusion Contest - physics-math - 11 May 2010 - New Scientist

'Impossible motion' trick wins Illusion Contest

A gravity-defying illusion has won the 2010 Best Illusion of the Year Contest, held yesterday in Naples, Florida.
The visual trick involves a 3D construction of four slopes that appear to extend downwards away from a common centre (see video). When wooden balls are placed on the slopes, however, they bizarrely roll upwards as if a magnet is pulling them.
But the "Impossible Motion" illusion, created by Kokichi Sugihara of the Meiji Institute for Advanced Study of Mathematical Sciences in Kawasaki, Japan, is soon dispelled when

'Impossible motion' trick wins Illusion Contest - physics-math - 11 May 2010 - New Scientist

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Weed resistance could mean herbicide is futile - environment - 13 May 2010 - New Scientist

Weed resistance could mean herbicide is futile

THE world's most popular herbicide is losing its knockout punch. More and more weeds are evolving resistance to glyphosate - originally marketed by Monsanto as Roundup - but the problem could have been forestalled by farming practices enriched by a better understanding of evolution.

This is a serious problem. "Glyphosate is as important to world food production as penicillin is to human health," says Stephen Powles, a plant scientist at the University of Western Australia in Perth.

In 1996, Monsanto began selling crop varieties genetically modified to contain a gene for glyphosate resistance. This enabled farmers to spray glyphosate - lethal to plants yet non-toxic to animals - on their fields to kill weeds without damaging the crops, even during the growing season.

Today nearly 100 million hectares worldwide are planted with glyphosate-resistant crops. In much of the south-eastern US, as well as Brazil and Argentina, farmers grow glyphosate-resistant corn, soybeans and cotton year after year and have come to rely almost exclusively on this herbicide. This has encouraged at least nine species of weed to evolve their own glyphosate resistance, to the point where some farmers can no longer control weed infestations.

Weed resistance could mean herbicide is futile - environment - 13 May 2010 - New Scientist

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

The Moral Life of Babies - NYTimes.com

NYTimes
May 3, 2010

The Moral Life of Babies



Not long ago, a team of researchers watched a 1-year-old boy take justice into his own hands. The boy had just seen a puppet show in which one puppet played with a ball while interacting with two other puppets. The center puppet would slide the ball to the puppet on the right, who would pass it back. And the center puppet would slide the ball to the puppet on the left . . . who would run away with it. Then the two puppets on the ends were brought down from the stage and set before the toddler. Each was placed next to a pile of treats. At this point, the toddler was asked to take a treat away from one puppet. Like most children in this situation, the boy took it from the pile of the “naughty” one. But this punishment wasn’t enough — he then leaned over and smacked the puppet in the head.
Continued at The Moral Life of Babies - NYTimes.com

Saturday, May 08, 2010

Workers on Oil Rig Recall a Terrible Night of Blasts

NYTimes
May 7, 2010

Workers on Oil Rig Recall a Terrible Night of Blasts

NEW ORLEANS — Nearly 50 miles offshore at the big oil rig floating on a glassy-calm sea, a helicopter landed early on the morning of April 20, carrying four executives from BP, the oil company. The men were visiting the Deepwater Horizon to help honor the crew for its standout safety record.


The rig workers were buzzing for another reason. They were nearly done with the latest job. It had been a little tricky, but it was nothing they could not handle.

As night fell, Micah Joseph Sandell, 40, was in the small cab of his crane, three stories above the bustling deck. Two floors down from the helipad, men in red coveralls waited for dinner in a hall lined with gold safety plaques. Eugene Dewayne Moss, a 37-year-old crane operator, realized he needed to tear himself away from a movie to get ready for his overnight shift.

“I thought, Oh man, I’ve got to go,” Mr. Moss recalled. “I got up, turned my TV off.”

Seconds later, a thundering explosion rocked the rig, the beginning of a terrifying night for the men who would survive one of the most harrowing disasters in the history of the oil business.

Continued at:  Workers on Oil Rig Recall a Terrible Night of Blasts

Friday, April 30, 2010

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

uwnews.org | Survey shows that among whites, tea party supporters more willing than others to curtail civil liberties | University of Washington News and Information

April 26, 2010 | Politics and Government
Survey shows that among whites, tea party supporters more willing than others to curtail civil liberties
Catherine O'Donnell cath2@u.washington.edu

A new University of Washington survey shows that whites who are strong supporters of the tea party are apparently less committed to freedom and equality than those who oppose or are unenthusiastic about the movement.

"Our survey suggests that among tea partiers, there's less dedication to certain civil liberties," said Christopher S. Parker, a UW assistant professor of political science who leads the 2010 Multi-State Survey of Race & Politics. It examines what Americans, including supporters of the tea party, think about race, public policy, national politics and President Barack Obama.

Among whites who strongly support the tea party, 60 percent agreed that America "has gone too far in pushing equal rights." By comparison, only 23 percent of white tea party opponents agreed with that statement.

Additionally:

• 94 percent of tea party opponents said American society "should do whatever is necessary to ensure equal opportunity." Of all whites polled for the survey, 79 percent agreed with that statement. Tea party supporters agreed less. Sixty-four percent said America should do whatever's necessary.

• 72 percent of tea party opponents concurred that "we don't give everyone an equal chance in this country." By comparison, 55 percent of all whites and 23 percent of strong tea party supporters concurred with that idea.

• 77 percent of tea party opponents agreed that "if people were treated more equally, we'd have many fewer problems in this country." By comparison, 54 percent of all whites and 31 percent of tea party supporters agreed.

As a populist movement, the tea party opposes big government and excessive government spending. Its supporters have held numerous meetings and rallies across the country this past year, including large ones on Tax Day, April 15.

The survey also shows tea party opponents more strongly opposed to government detainment, surveillance and racial or religious profiling than party supporters.

The findings show:

• 90 percent of tea party opponents dissented from the idea that the "government can detain people as long as it wishes without trial." By comparison, 70 percent of all whites and 54 percent of tea party supporters dissented.

• 72 percent of tea party opponents disagreed that the government should be able to tap people's telephones. By comparison, 50 percent of all whites and 33 percent of tea party supporters held that position.

• 94 percent of tea party opponents agreed that "no matter what a person's political beliefs, he or she is entitled to the same rights as everyone else." By comparison, 89 percent of all whites and 81 percent of tea party supporters agreed.

• 74 percent of tea party opponents dissented from the idea that "the government should be allowed to profile someone because of race or religion." By comparison, 57 percent of all whites and 33 percent of tea party supporters opposed such moves.

"Paradoxically, tea party supporters talk about freedom from government but as the data suggests, many strongly support certain government activities that could limit freedom," Parker said.

The survey also drew opinions about President Barack Obama: 79 percent of tea party opponents said Obama is knowledgeable, 74 percent said he's intelligent, 86 percent said he's moral and 79 percent said he's a strong leader.

Among all whites, 60 percent said Obama is knowledgeable, 63 percent said he's intelligent, 61 percent said he's moral and 64 percent said he's a strong leader.

Tea party supporters were less approving than both of those groups: 38 percent said Obama is knowledgeable, 37 percent said he's intelligent, 32 percent said he's moral and 44 percent said he's a strong leader.

The poll reached 1,006 people in seven states. Six of them -- Georgia, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio -- were battleground states in the 2008 presidential election. The seventh, California, was included to represent the West Coast.

The UW Center for Survey Research conducted the survey by phone from Feb. 8 to March 15. The sampling error margin is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. The Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race and Sexuality and the UW Department of Political Science paid for the survey.

###

For more information, contact Parker at 206-543-2947 or csparker@uw.edu .
uwnews.org | Survey shows that among whites, tea party supporters more willing than others to curtail civil liberties | University of Washington News and Information

Monday, April 26, 2010

Brown Bailout

This is an advertisement for FedEx, but I believe they are largely right: Brown Bailout

George Will says it's not a bailout, but UPS is getting a competitive edge on FedEx: Labor in the Driver's Seat

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Friday, April 16, 2010

Cartoons of the Week

Cartoons of the Week


Cartoons of the Week

‘Don’t tell your parents’ — school health center arranges abortion

‘Don’t tell your parents’ — school health center arranges abortion

April 15, 2010 by Carol Warner
Posted in: Special Report

This school health center helped a student get an abortion during school hours — without telling her parents first. How did this parental-notification failure happen?
(The student’s name has been withheld to protect her privacy. Her mother has only been identified as “Jill” by KOMO News.)
The 15-year-old girl attends Ballard High School in Seattle.
At the beginning of the school year, Jill signed a permission slip that gave the school’s on-campus Teen Health Center the OK to treat her daughter.
Jill said she assumed that meant Ballard’s Teen Health Center might treat her daughter for headaches, earaches and such.
She realized the center’s staff might even spell out birth control options. Jill didn’t expect school health center staffers to put her daughter in a taxi and send her to have an abortion during school hours without being informed of the decision.
But that’s exactly what happened!
“[My daughter] took a pregnancy test at school at the teen health center,” Jill said. “Nowhere in this paperwork does it mention abortion or facilitating [an] abortion.
“We had no idea this was being facilitated on campus,” she continued. “They just told her that if she concealed it from her family, that it would be free of charge. [It] makes me feel like my rights [as a mother] were completely stripped away.”
The school heath center’s response
The Seattle School District pointed out that it doesn’t run the on-campus health clinic. It noted that the Swedish Medical Center runs the Teen Health Center inside the school. And the Swedish Medical Center says it protects students’ privacy.
Under Washington state law, an individual of any age “can consent to a termination of pregnancy,” according to T.J. Cosgrove of the King County Health Department, which administers the school-based programs for the health department.
The tricky gray area
Setting aside the obvious political and ethical arguments surrounding abortion, another big issue in this case is parental notification.
The recent alleged laptop spying incident in Pennsylvania proves that parents can get into litigious moods when they aren’t informed about what’s happening with their children.
Truth is, today’s technology makes communicating with parents easier than ever. Schools have myriad options, such as Web sites, phones, e-mails and text messages.
The school’s Web site lists services offered at the Teen Health Center. It mentions “birth control” and “confidential family planning,” but it doesn’t specifically spell out abortion. Neither does the electronic permission slip. Was “abortion” omitted intentionally?
Maybe, especially since the girl was allegedly told not to tell her parents so the abortion would be free.
Considering all of the tech options available for communicating with parents, do you think this school dropped the ball? Chime in below.

Tags: , , , ,


‘Don’t tell your parents’ — school health center arranges abortion

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Investigations sit idle as LAPD detectives hit overtime caps - latimes.com

latimes.com

Investigations sit idle as LAPD detectives hit overtime caps

With its overtime budget decimated, the department is forcing officers to put cases on hold and take days or even weeks off. Despite an uptick in killings, the homicide unit is among the hardest hit.

By Joel Rubin
April 12, 2010


In January, Los Angeles Police Det. Nate Kouri was ordered to stop working.

One of the LAPD's most productive homicide investigators sat idle for six weeks, unable to follow any leads on old cases or pick up new ones. Kouri was not being punished for misconduct or for botching an investigation. He was benched for working too hard -- and he is not the only one.

With the city reeling from its worst financial crisis in decades, the LAPD has stopped paying officers overtime wages, except in rare situations. In lieu of cash, officials have implemented a strict policy of forcing cops to take time off when they accrue large amounts of overtime hours. Because of demanding work schedules that routinely require them to investigate a case into the night or through the weekend, homicide detectives have been among the first officers to be sent home in significant numbers.

The drain on homicide squads has hampered investigations, several detectives and top department officials said in interviews. Detectives said their investigations are frequently put on hold while they take days off, delaying witness interviews and other potentially important leads. And, in the crucial first hours after a killing, several supervisors said they now dispatch fewer detectives to the crime scene.

A rash of homicides in recent weeks has compounded the problem, placing increased strain on detectives already running up against overtime limits and leaving homicide supervisors to worry that a prolonged surge in killings will quickly overwhelm the stop-gap measures they are currently using to get by.

LAPD Chief Charlie Beck has used the rise in killings to underscore his frequent warnings to city lawmakers that further cuts to the department's budget would continue to compromise its ability to fight crime.

"The hours have to come from someplace," Beck said last week at a meeting with the Los Angeles Police Commission, which oversees the department. "It has a serious impact on our ability to respond to some of the large, violent incidents we've been experiencing lately. That is especially true of homicide investigations because of the long hours they demand."

In past years, the LAPD typically spent about $100 million in overtime. The department is planning to set aside less than $10 million for the upcoming fiscal year to cover certain work scenarios mandated under federal labor laws.

Before the city's fiscal crisis, an agreement between the department and police union called for officers to build up a bank of about 100 hours of overtime and then be paid cash for hours worked beyond that. Late last year, the department renegotiated the agreement and now officers are not paid until they have accrued 400 hours of extra work. To make sure no officer reaches that trigger point, the department's new policy forbids them from banking more than 250 hours.

In the Southeast Division, where Kouri works, the 11-person homicide squad was ordered to take off 700 hours in February -- a month when they opened five new investigations. The same group responded to five killings last February, but worked 500 hours of overtime to solve them.

Nine of the 14 killings this year in the Southeast area remain unsolved.

"That is horrible compared to our typical rates," said Det. Sal LaBarbera, a 24-year homicide veteran who supervises the Southeast squad. "All of those cases are solvable. None of them are mysteries. A few of them would likely already be solved, if I could just let my guys loose to work."

Similar situations are playing out elsewhere. Late on a recent Saturday night in the Newton Division, two killings took place in quick succession. Det. Kelle Baitx, the homicide supervisor, said typically he would have sent a team of two detectives to each of the crime scenes. That night, however, he had one team take care of both crime scenes because other detectives were approaching their overtime limits. One of the cases was later reassigned to another team during regular working hours.

"It's not ideal," Baitx said of the overtime cap, noting that as a general rule detectives handling a case should work the crime scene as well.

In the Foothill Division, when five slayings occurred in March, a detective assigned to work on old, unsolved killings was enlisted to help. It's a move supervisors in other divisions have made, highlighting concerns that the overtime crunch will deal a blow to the department's ability to solve cold cases.

Trying to balance the overtime limits with the need to solve cases, the supervisor in Foothill watched one of his detective's overtime hours climb as she worked one of the recent cases. After three days, when she typically would have pressed on through the weekend, he ordered her to stop and stay home for several days.

Supervisors said they are also seeing the policy take a toll on morale among their detectives. "It's really disheartening," said Kouri, who solved more than a dozen cases last year. "It goes against the mentality of homicide detectives. All we want to do is work our cases. That's what we feel we owe to the families of victims -- to work straight through."

Several detectives said they don't always drop their cases during down days, making phone calls and filling out paperwork on their own time.

The detectives are taking a financial hit as well, since roughly a third of their pay has traditionally come from overtime wages.

Many, like Kouri, who were over the cap from the start were forced to take extended leaves to lower their totals. Going forward, Beck put field commanders on notice that they were responsible for keeping their officers below the limit. At weekly meetings once reserved for reviewing crime-fighting strategies, the commanders are grilled on what they are doing to keep work hours in check.

Homicide squads are not the only units feeling the brunt of the overtime rule. Large numbers of officers in other specialized assignments, such as the SWAT, canine and bomb units, are also at or above the limit. And, in several stations situated in high-crime areas, the number of regular patrol and anti-gang officers above 200 hours of overtime has reached double digits.

The policy has had a significant effect on the number of officers available to work. Last year, officers decided to take about 17,000 hours off each month in compensation for overtime, department figures show.

In March, that number soared to nearly 60,000 hours. The increase in lost work hours was the equivalent to removing about 290 officers from the department roster.

"In homicide, we create our own luck by staying out there and beating bushes until we find what we need," said Det. Chris Barling, who oversees the LAPD's South Bureau homicide unit. "Are we going to miss something because my guys are being forced to take two days off in the middle of an investigation? Could this cause us to not solve a case? Sure."

joel.rubin@latimes.com



Investigations sit idle as LAPD detectives hit overtime caps - latimes.com
http://latimes.com/news/la-me-lapd12-2010apr12,0,834412.story

News: Who Really Failed? - Inside Higher Ed

News: Who Really Failed? - Inside Higher Ed

Who Really Failed?

April 15, 2010
Dominique G. Homberger won't apologize for setting high expectations for her students.

The biology professor at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge gives brief quizzes at the beginning of every class, to assure attendance and to make sure students are doing the reading. On her tests, she doesn't use a curve, as she believes that students must achieve mastery of the subject matter, not just achieve more mastery than the worst students in the course. For multiple choice questions, she gives 10 possible answers, not the expected 4, as she doesn't want students to get very far with guessing.

Students in introductory biology don't need to worry about meeting her standards anymore. LSU removed her from teaching, mid-semester, and raised the grades of students in the class. In so doing, the university's administration has set off a debate about grade inflation, due process and a professor's right to set standards in her own course.

To Homberger and her supporters, the university's action has violated principles of academic freedom and weakened the faculty.

"This is terrible. It undercuts all of what we do," said Brooks Ellwood, president of the LSU Chapter of the American Association of University Professors, and the Robey H. Clark Distinguished Professor of Geology. "If you are a non-tenured professor at this university, you have to think very seriously about whether you are going to fail too many students for the administration to tolerate."


News: Who Really Failed? - Inside Higher Ed